<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS is STILL Not Very Simple!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/rss-still-not-very-simple/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/rss-still-not-very-simple</link>
	<description>Keeping an eye on the Web, so you don't have to.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jørgen Arnor Gårdsø Lom</title>
		<link>http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/rss-still-not-very-simple#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Jørgen Arnor Gårdsø Lom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/rss-still-not-very-simple#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Can I lower my hand down, now?

I think much of the problem with RSS is that the only effective solution I've found is NetNewsWire via Safari... Are there ANY good, user friendly RSS readers for Windows at all?! Even though I hate to admit it,- most non-techies are on Win...

I don't think the "finding sites that sport RSS" should be that much of a problem - we already see most sites on the web having RSS-feeds; and if people were to see all the benefits, I cannot possibly believe that the trend would in any way turn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I lower my hand down, now?</p>
<p>I think much of the problem with RSS is that the only effective solution I&#8217;ve found is NetNewsWire via Safari&#8230; Are there ANY good, user friendly RSS readers for Windows at all?! Even though I hate to admit it,- most non-techies are on Win&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the &#8220;finding sites that sport RSS&#8221; should be that much of a problem - we already see most sites on the web having RSS-feeds; and if people were to see all the benefits, I cannot possibly believe that the trend would in any way turn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Winder</title>
		<link>http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/rss-still-not-very-simple#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Winder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattheerema.com/archive/rss-still-not-very-simple#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt, it looks like you and I were pondering the very same things at almost the same time, not a big shock.  I think you need to look at the value of RSS from the "audience" perspective not the "publishing" perspective, as you've already said.  I made this point on my blog here: http://iflocked.wordpress.com/2005/11/23/the-value-of-rss/

Regards

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt, it looks like you and I were pondering the very same things at almost the same time, not a big shock.  I think you need to look at the value of RSS from the &#8220;audience&#8221; perspective not the &#8220;publishing&#8221; perspective, as you&#8217;ve already said.  I made this point on my blog here: <a href="http://iflocked.wordpress.com/2005/11/23/the-value-of-rss/" rel="nofollow">http://iflocked.wordpress.com/2005/11/23/the-value-of-rss/</a></p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
